<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1653 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272902</link>
    <description>The appeal challenging a penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was partly allowed. The penalty was confirmed to a certain extent based on turnover and cash deposits, with a portion of the penalty amount deleted. The appellant&#039;s explanation regarding business dealings was partially accepted, resulting in the partial allowance of the appeal. The judgment was pronounced by the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad on September 22, 2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2018 08:32:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521479" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1653 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272902</link>
      <description>The appeal challenging a penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was partly allowed. The penalty was confirmed to a certain extent based on turnover and cash deposits, with a portion of the penalty amount deleted. The appellant&#039;s explanation regarding business dealings was partially accepted, resulting in the partial allowance of the appeal. The judgment was pronounced by the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad on September 22, 2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272902</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>