https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360876 The High Court analyzed the challenge to a notice for reopening assessment for the assessment year 2010-11, focusing on the Assessing Officer's failure to address specific factual contentions raised by the petitioner. Despite evidence of investment from specified companies, the court criticized the Assessing Officer's handling of objections and directed the petitioner to raise disputed grounds during the assessment process. The court did not conclusively reject the challenge to the notice but emphasized the petitioner's right to pursue legal recourse if needed. en-us Tue, 20 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 May 2018 08:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360876 The High Court analyzed the challenge to a notice for reopening assessment for the assessment year 2010-11, focusing on the Assessing Officer's failure to address specific factual contentions raised by the petitioner. Despite evidence of investment from specified companies, the court criticized the Assessing Officer's handling of objections and directed the petitioner to raise disputed grounds during the assessment process. The court did not conclusively reject the challenge to the notice but emphasized the petitioner's right to pursue legal recourse if needed. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 20 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360876