<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1427 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360863</link>
    <description>The appellate authority under customs law has no power to condone delay beyond the further statutory period of thirty days for filing an appeal. Where an appeal is presented after the initial limitation period and the delay sought to be excused exceeds that express ceiling, equitable considerations cannot enlarge the jurisdiction to condone. On that basis, the appeal was treated as time-barred and its dismissal as not maintainable was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2018 08:12:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521458" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1427 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360863</link>
      <description>The appellate authority under customs law has no power to condone delay beyond the further statutory period of thirty days for filing an appeal. Where an appeal is presented after the initial limitation period and the delay sought to be excused exceeds that express ceiling, equitable considerations cannot enlarge the jurisdiction to condone. On that basis, the appeal was treated as time-barred and its dismissal as not maintainable was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360863</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>