https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360862 A Customs Broker prohibition under Regulation 23 of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013 was not interfered with where the record showed a prima facie case of facilitating serious licence misuse for monetary consideration. The Bench relied on the investigation report and noted that the disciplinary authority for licensing proceedings was not the Bangalore Commissioner. It declined to disturb the prohibition order at that stage, but granted liberty to seek a post-decisional hearing before the Commissioner and to adduce additional evidence in support of innocence. en-us Tue, 13 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 May 2018 08:12:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360862 A Customs Broker prohibition under Regulation 23 of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013 was not interfered with where the record showed a prima facie case of facilitating serious licence misuse for monetary consideration. The Bench relied on the investigation report and noted that the disciplinary authority for licensing proceedings was not the Bangalore Commissioner. It declined to disturb the prohibition order at that stage, but granted liberty to seek a post-decisional hearing before the Commissioner and to adduce additional evidence in support of innocence. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 13 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360862