https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360859 The High Court held that despite the statutory time limit for filing an appeal against an order-in-original, the writ jurisdiction of the Court can examine the legality of the order. In this case, the petitioner's delay of over 400 days in challenging the order was not justified, as explanations provided did not align with legislative intent. The Court emphasized that writ remedies should not serve as parallel appellate remedies and dismissed the petition due to the substantial delay in addressing the issues raised. en-us Thu, 15 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 May 2018 08:09:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360859 The High Court held that despite the statutory time limit for filing an appeal against an order-in-original, the writ jurisdiction of the Court can examine the legality of the order. In this case, the petitioner's delay of over 400 days in challenging the order was not justified, as explanations provided did not align with legislative intent. The Court emphasized that writ remedies should not serve as parallel appellate remedies and dismissed the petition due to the substantial delay in addressing the issues raised. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 15 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360859