https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360854 The Tribunal held that the appellant is liable to pay service tax on incentives received for using AMADEUS systems and on remuneration/commission from insurance companies. However, penalties were set aside. Regarding CENVAT credit, the appellant exceeded the permissible limit for common inputs, leading to a demand for service tax and interest. Penalties were set aside, but the demand was upheld. The appeals were partly allowed with penalties being waived but the service tax and interest demands being maintained. en-us Fri, 18 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 May 2018 08:05:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360854 The Tribunal held that the appellant is liable to pay service tax on incentives received for using AMADEUS systems and on remuneration/commission from insurance companies. However, penalties were set aside. Regarding CENVAT credit, the appellant exceeded the permissible limit for common inputs, leading to a demand for service tax and interest. Penalties were set aside, but the demand was upheld. The appeals were partly allowed with penalties being waived but the service tax and interest demands being maintained. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 18 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360854