<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1409 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360845</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that subsidies received in the form of remission of tax related to capital investment should not be included in the assessable value for excise duty calculation. The Tribunal emphasized that VAT amounts paid using VAT 37B Challans should not be part of the assessable value. The impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals filed by the appellants were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2018 07:04:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521434" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1409 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360845</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that subsidies received in the form of remission of tax related to capital investment should not be included in the assessable value for excise duty calculation. The Tribunal emphasized that VAT amounts paid using VAT 37B Challans should not be part of the assessable value. The impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals filed by the appellants were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360845</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>