https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360842 The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand under Rule 6(3)(i) of the Cenvat Credit Rules. The appellant had reversed the common input service credit and interest, leading to the conclusion that the demand was not sustainable. Relying on precedent decisions, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, highlighting the importance of complying with the specified procedures and rectifying non-compliance to avoid such demands in similar cases. en-us Wed, 28 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 May 2018 07:02:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360842 The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand under Rule 6(3)(i) of the Cenvat Credit Rules. The appellant had reversed the common input service credit and interest, leading to the conclusion that the demand was not sustainable. Relying on precedent decisions, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, highlighting the importance of complying with the specified procedures and rectifying non-compliance to avoid such demands in similar cases. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 28 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360842