<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 81 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13133</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the administrator was entitled to the benefit of valuation under section 7(4) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 for the assessment year 1977-78. The Court emphasized that the use of the property for residential purposes by the legal heirs entitled to a share in the estate was sufficient to fulfill the conditions of the provision, even if the administrator did not reside in the property.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 16:06:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52143" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 81 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13133</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the administrator was entitled to the benefit of valuation under section 7(4) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 for the assessment year 1977-78. The Court emphasized that the use of the property for residential purposes by the legal heirs entitled to a share in the estate was sufficient to fulfill the conditions of the provision, even if the administrator did not reside in the property.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13133</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>