<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1399 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360835</link>
    <description>Entitlement to concessional duty under the exemption notification depended on whether the unit was a wood pulp plant or a plant designed for pulping agricultural residues. The Tribunal relied on investigation evidence showing that wood chips were not used in pulp manufacture and that their limited purchase was only for a boiler trial run, a fact not disputed. Applying the earlier decision on identical facts, it held that a plant must be judged by its design and actual use, and that mere capability of processing some wood-related material does not disqualify a unit otherwise meant for agro-residue pulping. The respondent was therefore entitled to the concessional rate of duty, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2018 06:52:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521421" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1399 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360835</link>
      <description>Entitlement to concessional duty under the exemption notification depended on whether the unit was a wood pulp plant or a plant designed for pulping agricultural residues. The Tribunal relied on investigation evidence showing that wood chips were not used in pulp manufacture and that their limited purchase was only for a boiler trial run, a fact not disputed. Applying the earlier decision on identical facts, it held that a plant must be judged by its design and actual use, and that mere capability of processing some wood-related material does not disqualify a unit otherwise meant for agro-residue pulping. The respondent was therefore entitled to the concessional rate of duty, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360835</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>