<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Stresses Adherence to Assessment Conclusions for Penalties u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=39546</link>
    <description>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - discretion to impose penalty - When the proceedings of assessment in which the additions in the hands of the assessee were made, the Tribunal could not have ignored such final conclusions by simply adopting the different mode or yardstick to judge the amount of tax sought to be evaded by the assessee. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2018 17:26:50 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2018 17:26:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521402" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Stresses Adherence to Assessment Conclusions for Penalties u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=39546</link>
      <description>Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - discretion to impose penalty - When the proceedings of assessment in which the additions in the hands of the assessee were made, the Tribunal could not have ignored such final conclusions by simply adopting the different mode or yardstick to judge the amount of tax sought to be evaded by the assessee. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2018 17:26:50 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=39546</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>