<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1920 (4) TMI 1 - Madras High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272897</link>
    <description>A creditor defrauded, defeated or delayed by a transfer may avoid it under Section 53 of the Transfer of Property Act by an open and unequivocal act, without first bringing a separate suit to set it aside. In execution proceedings under Order 21, Rules 58 to 63 of the Civil Procedure Code, the claim-and-suit mechanism is intended to determine title quickly, and a suit under Rule 63 permits the decree-holder to defend the attachment by showing that the claimant&#039;s transfer is not binding because it is fraudulent as against the decree-holder. An attaching decree-holder may therefore raise Section 53 as a defence in the claimant&#039;s suit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 1920 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2018 17:23:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1920 (4) TMI 1 - Madras High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272897</link>
      <description>A creditor defrauded, defeated or delayed by a transfer may avoid it under Section 53 of the Transfer of Property Act by an open and unequivocal act, without first bringing a separate suit to set it aside. In execution proceedings under Order 21, Rules 58 to 63 of the Civil Procedure Code, the claim-and-suit mechanism is intended to determine title quickly, and a suit under Rule 63 permits the decree-holder to defend the attachment by showing that the claimant&#039;s transfer is not binding because it is fraudulent as against the decree-holder. An attaching decree-holder may therefore raise Section 53 as a defence in the claimant&#039;s suit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 1920 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272897</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>