<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (8) TMI 171 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272892</link>
    <description>After a town planning scheme is finally sanctioned under the Bombay Town Planning Act, 1954 and acquires statutory force, only non-compliance with minimum essential requirements affecting jurisdiction can invalidate it. The old Rule 21(3) individual notice requirement, and any related opportunity under Rule 21(4), was treated as an additional procedural safeguard at the draft stage and capable of waiver. Its breach did not nullify the final scheme, and earlier views treating that notice as mandatory to the point of invalidity were incorrect to that extent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2018 12:05:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521367" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (8) TMI 171 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272892</link>
      <description>After a town planning scheme is finally sanctioned under the Bombay Town Planning Act, 1954 and acquires statutory force, only non-compliance with minimum essential requirements affecting jurisdiction can invalidate it. The old Rule 21(3) individual notice requirement, and any related opportunity under Rule 21(4), was treated as an additional procedural safeguard at the draft stage and capable of waiver. Its breach did not nullify the final scheme, and earlier views treating that notice as mandatory to the point of invalidity were incorrect to that extent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272892</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>