<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (4) TMI 229 - High Court Punjab And Haryana</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272891</link>
    <description>A notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 is valid only if its substance is published in the concerned locality simultaneously with, or immediately after, publication in the Official Gazette. The Court treated locality publication as mandatory because the objection period under Section 5A begins on Gazette publication, and delay would curtail affected landowners&#039; right to object and defeat the notice requirement. As the substance of the notification was published in the locality only 29 days after the Gazette notice, the Section 4 notification was held invalid and the acquisition proceedings were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2018 11:44:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (4) TMI 229 - High Court Punjab And Haryana</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272891</link>
      <description>A notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 is valid only if its substance is published in the concerned locality simultaneously with, or immediately after, publication in the Official Gazette. The Court treated locality publication as mandatory because the objection period under Section 5A begins on Gazette publication, and delay would curtail affected landowners&#039; right to object and defeat the notice requirement. As the substance of the notification was published in the locality only 29 days after the Gazette notice, the Section 4 notification was held invalid and the acquisition proceedings were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272891</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>