https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272888 A transferee from a landowner was held to be a person interested under the Pepsu Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1955, because transfers had to be disclosed in the statutory return and draft statement, and Section 32-FF preserved such transfers against the transferor and transferee while making them ineffective only against the State. Since proceedings to declare surplus area could directly affect the transferee's rights, including a possible claim under the proviso to Section 32-FF, natural justice applied even without an express notice provision. The transferee was therefore entitled to notice and an opportunity of hearing before the transferor's surplus area was declared. en-us Wed, 25 Aug 1971 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 May 2018 10:54:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272888 A transferee from a landowner was held to be a person interested under the Pepsu Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1955, because transfers had to be disclosed in the statutory return and draft statement, and Section 32-FF preserved such transfers against the transferor and transferee while making them ineffective only against the State. Since proceedings to declare surplus area could directly affect the transferee's rights, including a possible claim under the proviso to Section 32-FF, natural justice applied even without an express notice provision. The transferee was therefore entitled to notice and an opportunity of hearing before the transferor's surplus area was declared. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 25 Aug 1971 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272888