<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (11) TMI 71 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13125</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, overturning the decisions of the Appellate Tribunal. It held that the reference under section 142(2A) of the Income-tax Act was valid, as the Assessing Officer was obligated to complete the assessment despite no pending proceeding. The Court also determined that the assessment completion date fell within the permissible timeframe under section 153 of the Act, excluding the period for the special audit. Additionally, the special audit ordered under section 142(2A) was deemed authorized. The Court directed the Tribunal to reconsider the appeals based on the clarified legal positions provided in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 15:19:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52135" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (11) TMI 71 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13125</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, overturning the decisions of the Appellate Tribunal. It held that the reference under section 142(2A) of the Income-tax Act was valid, as the Assessing Officer was obligated to complete the assessment despite no pending proceeding. The Court also determined that the assessment completion date fell within the permissible timeframe under section 153 of the Act, excluding the period for the special audit. Additionally, the special audit ordered under section 142(2A) was deemed authorized. The Court directed the Tribunal to reconsider the appeals based on the clarified legal positions provided in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13125</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>