<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 76 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13123</link>
    <description>Royalty income under the agreement signed on 10 December 1981 qualified for the concessional 30% tax rate under article 13(2) of the India-U.K. tax treaty because the contract was signed after the Convention came into force on 23 November 1981. The court treated the 1981 agreement as a fresh contract, not a mere extension of the earlier 1971 arrangement, since its royalty structure and contractual conditions were materially different. The fact that it was made effective from 1 January 1980 did not change its legal character as an agreement signed after the treaty&#039;s commencement. The Revenue&#039;s attempt to apply the higher rate was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 15:13:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 76 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13123</link>
      <description>Royalty income under the agreement signed on 10 December 1981 qualified for the concessional 30% tax rate under article 13(2) of the India-U.K. tax treaty because the contract was signed after the Convention came into force on 23 November 1981. The court treated the 1981 agreement as a fresh contract, not a mere extension of the earlier 1971 arrangement, since its royalty structure and contractual conditions were materially different. The fact that it was made effective from 1 January 1980 did not change its legal character as an agreement signed after the treaty&#039;s commencement. The Revenue&#039;s attempt to apply the higher rate was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13123</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>