<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1363 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360799</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai ruled that non-refundable one-time premium deposits in the leasing of premises of a Government local authority are not subject to Service Tax under the category of renting of immovable property. The Tribunal distinguished between rent and one-time premiums, emphasizing that tax is applicable only on the rent component for continuous enjoyment under a lease. Relying on precedent, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, determining that such deposits are not taxable under the relevant provisions. The judgment, issued on 16.05.2018, favored the appellant, establishing the non-taxability of such deposits in this context.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2018 07:41:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521326" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1363 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360799</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai ruled that non-refundable one-time premium deposits in the leasing of premises of a Government local authority are not subject to Service Tax under the category of renting of immovable property. The Tribunal distinguished between rent and one-time premiums, emphasizing that tax is applicable only on the rent component for continuous enjoyment under a lease. Relying on precedent, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, determining that such deposits are not taxable under the relevant provisions. The judgment, issued on 16.05.2018, favored the appellant, establishing the non-taxability of such deposits in this context.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>