<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1354 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360790</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, citing the Ranbaxy case precedent, and directed the payment of interest on the delayed refund claim. The Tribunal concluded that the appellant was entitled to claim interest for the period between filing the refund claim and its realization, as the claim had been sanctioned with a delay of three months. The remaining interest was ordered to be paid to the appellant within 30 days, deducting the amount already sanctioned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2018 07:41:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521317" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1354 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360790</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, citing the Ranbaxy case precedent, and directed the payment of interest on the delayed refund claim. The Tribunal concluded that the appellant was entitled to claim interest for the period between filing the refund claim and its realization, as the claim had been sanctioned with a delay of three months. The remaining interest was ordered to be paid to the appellant within 30 days, deducting the amount already sanctioned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360790</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>