<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1352 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360788</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the appellant was entitled to claim interest for the period after three months from the date of filing the refund claim until its realization. The decision was based on Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and judicial precedents supporting the appellant&#039;s claim for interest on delayed refunds. The appellant&#039;s entitlement to interest was upheld despite opposition citing a different case law precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2019 15:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521315" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1352 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360788</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the appellant was entitled to claim interest for the period after three months from the date of filing the refund claim until its realization. The decision was based on Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and judicial precedents supporting the appellant&#039;s claim for interest on delayed refunds. The appellant&#039;s entitlement to interest was upheld despite opposition citing a different case law precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360788</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>