<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1347 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360783</link>
    <description>Provisional assessment may be treated as valid and capable of finalisation where the assessee applied for it, executed bonds and bank guarantees, disclosed the clearances in regular returns, and the department was aware of the arrangement; the absence of a formal permitting order was not decisive. Post-clearance discounts supported by the assessee&#039;s sales practice and returns were treated as deductible in determining assessable value, and the absence of a show cause notice weighed against sustaining the demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2020 11:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521310" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1347 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360783</link>
      <description>Provisional assessment may be treated as valid and capable of finalisation where the assessee applied for it, executed bonds and bank guarantees, disclosed the clearances in regular returns, and the department was aware of the arrangement; the absence of a formal permitting order was not decisive. Post-clearance discounts supported by the assessee&#039;s sales practice and returns were treated as deductible in determining assessable value, and the absence of a show cause notice weighed against sustaining the demand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>