https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360778 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of pesticides and insecticides, in a case concerning the correct assessment under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant packaged goods with Maximum Retail Price (MRP) printed on them for retail sale, paying duty under Section 4A. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of MRP printing as mandated by the Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977, to protect consumers. It concluded that the appellant correctly discharged duty liability under Section 4A for goods intended for retail sale, setting aside the Revenue's order and allowing the appeal. en-us Mon, 19 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 May 2018 07:40:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360778 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of pesticides and insecticides, in a case concerning the correct assessment under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant packaged goods with Maximum Retail Price (MRP) printed on them for retail sale, paying duty under Section 4A. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of MRP printing as mandated by the Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977, to protect consumers. It concluded that the appellant correctly discharged duty liability under Section 4A for goods intended for retail sale, setting aside the Revenue's order and allowing the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 19 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360778