https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272882 A pending appeal does not by itself stay execution of a decree under the U. P. Tenancy Act because the Code of Civil Procedure applies and Order 41 Rule 5(1) requires a specific stay. The limitation provision governs when execution may be sought, but it does not extinguish the decree-holder's right to execute before appellate finality. The expression "final decree" refers to the decree that ultimately attains finality in law; if no appeal is filed, finality arises on expiry of the appeal period, and if an appeal or revision is filed, finality follows the appellate or revisional decree. Execution is therefore not premature merely because proceedings are still pending. en-us Wed, 29 Apr 1953 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 May 2018 18:20:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272882 A pending appeal does not by itself stay execution of a decree under the U. P. Tenancy Act because the Code of Civil Procedure applies and Order 41 Rule 5(1) requires a specific stay. The limitation provision governs when execution may be sought, but it does not extinguish the decree-holder's right to execute before appellate finality. The expression "final decree" refers to the decree that ultimately attains finality in law; if no appeal is filed, finality arises on expiry of the appeal period, and if an appeal or revision is filed, finality follows the appellate or revisional decree. Execution is therefore not premature merely because proceedings are still pending. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 29 Apr 1953 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272882