https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272873 Adequate hearing under Section 28(3) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act was found to have been given because notice was served, objections were filed, an adjournment was sought, and the petitioner was heard on the later date. Section 11-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was held inapplicable to KIAD Act acquisitions because the land vests absolutely in the State on publication of the final declaration and the statute provides no reversion. Although the acquisition did not lapse, the Court recognized that unexplained delay in making the award can justify limited relief, and directed that the award be made within three months with additional compensation for the delayed period. en-us Mon, 20 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 May 2018 12:16:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272873 Adequate hearing under Section 28(3) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act was found to have been given because notice was served, objections were filed, an adjournment was sought, and the petitioner was heard on the later date. Section 11-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was held inapplicable to KIAD Act acquisitions because the land vests absolutely in the State on publication of the final declaration and the statute provides no reversion. Although the acquisition did not lapse, the Court recognized that unexplained delay in making the award can justify limited relief, and directed that the award be made within three months with additional compensation for the delayed period. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 20 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272873