https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272871 An approved Chapter IV-A scheme reserving a notified route or portion exclusively for the State Transport Undertaking excludes overlapping private stage carriage permits by operation of law. Section 68-F(2) requires the transport authority to refuse renewal and to cancel or curtail existing permits to the extent needed to give effect to the exclusive scheme, even if the scheme does not contain an express clause directing cancellation or modification. Corridor restrictions do not preserve private operation on the notified portion, because passenger carriage for hire on that stretch still conflicts with the scheme's exclusivity. A scheme providing only partial exclusion stands on a different footing, but the text states that was not the position here. en-us Thu, 22 Jul 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 May 2018 12:06:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272871 An approved Chapter IV-A scheme reserving a notified route or portion exclusively for the State Transport Undertaking excludes overlapping private stage carriage permits by operation of law. Section 68-F(2) requires the transport authority to refuse renewal and to cancel or curtail existing permits to the extent needed to give effect to the exclusive scheme, even if the scheme does not contain an express clause directing cancellation or modification. Corridor restrictions do not preserve private operation on the notified portion, because passenger carriage for hire on that stretch still conflicts with the scheme's exclusivity. A scheme providing only partial exclusion stands on a different footing, but the text states that was not the position here. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 22 Jul 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272871