https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360766 The High Court quashed the conditional order of stay issued by the 2nd respondent due to lack of reasons provided for imposing conditions. Emphasizing the necessity of validly exercised discretion and the requirement for reasons in such situations, the court directed the 2nd respondent to issue fresh orders after hearing the petitioner. Recovery actions against the petitioner were stayed pending the issuance of new orders, ensuring procedural fairness and adherence to legal principles outlined in the Archana Agencies case. en-us Tue, 15 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Feb 2025 11:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360766 The High Court quashed the conditional order of stay issued by the 2nd respondent due to lack of reasons provided for imposing conditions. Emphasizing the necessity of validly exercised discretion and the requirement for reasons in such situations, the court directed the 2nd respondent to issue fresh orders after hearing the petitioner. Recovery actions against the petitioner were stayed pending the issuance of new orders, ensuring procedural fairness and adherence to legal principles outlined in the Archana Agencies case. Case-Laws GST Tue, 15 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360766