<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1320 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360756</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, remanding the Annual Letting Value assessment to the Assessing Officer and deleting the disallowance under Section 14A of the Act. The Tribunal found that the properties were used by separate legal entities and that the disallowance under rule 8D was incorrect due to the absence of actual expenditure related to earning exempt income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2018 08:59:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521234" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1320 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360756</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, remanding the Annual Letting Value assessment to the Assessing Officer and deleting the disallowance under Section 14A of the Act. The Tribunal found that the properties were used by separate legal entities and that the disallowance under rule 8D was incorrect due to the absence of actual expenditure related to earning exempt income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360756</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>