https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360734 The tribunal upheld the charging of interest under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944, for wrongly availed cenvat credit. However, it set aside the penalty imposed under Rule 15(3) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 read with Rule 25 of Central Excise Rules, 2002, due to the appellant's lack of malafide intent. The appeal was partly allowed in favor of the appellant, with the judgment pronounced on 17/05/2018 by the tribunal. en-us Thu, 17 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 May 2018 08:43:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360734 The tribunal upheld the charging of interest under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944, for wrongly availed cenvat credit. However, it set aside the penalty imposed under Rule 15(3) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 read with Rule 25 of Central Excise Rules, 2002, due to the appellant's lack of malafide intent. The appeal was partly allowed in favor of the appellant, with the judgment pronounced on 17/05/2018 by the tribunal. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 17 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360734