<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1292 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360728</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, granting the refund of excess payment on courier services with interest. The rejection of the refund claim was deemed legally unsustainable due to timely filing within the statutory limitation period and the undisputed eligibility of CENVAT credit on courier services. The matter was remanded to the original authority for verification and subsequent refund of service tax and interest, excluding the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2018 08:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521199" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1292 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360728</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, granting the refund of excess payment on courier services with interest. The rejection of the refund claim was deemed legally unsustainable due to timely filing within the statutory limitation period and the undisputed eligibility of CENVAT credit on courier services. The matter was remanded to the original authority for verification and subsequent refund of service tax and interest, excluding the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360728</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>