<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1290 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360726</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit under the input service definition was allowed for event management, credit card charges, vehicle repair and maintenance, miscellaneous services, mediclaim insurance for employees and dependents, club membership used for business purposes, and survey for purchase of land, applying the statutory definition and prior authority. Credit was denied for security at the residence of the CMD/JMD and for outdoor catering after 01.04.2011 in view of the post-amendment position and the Larger Bench ruling relied upon. A denial of credit on execution of work at the factory was also set aside because that ground was not specifically proposed in the show cause notice or recorded in the original order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2018 12:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521195" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1290 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360726</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit under the input service definition was allowed for event management, credit card charges, vehicle repair and maintenance, miscellaneous services, mediclaim insurance for employees and dependents, club membership used for business purposes, and survey for purchase of land, applying the statutory definition and prior authority. Credit was denied for security at the residence of the CMD/JMD and for outdoor catering after 01.04.2011 in view of the post-amendment position and the Larger Bench ruling relied upon. A denial of credit on execution of work at the factory was also set aside because that ground was not specifically proposed in the show cause notice or recorded in the original order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360726</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>