<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (11) TMI 6 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13109</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, stating that the filing of a revised return post-survey is a factual inquiry and not a legal issue. It emphasized that the absence of incriminating material during the survey and the good faith disclosure by the assessee supported eligibility for benefits under the amnesty scheme. The Court rejected the applications, as no legal questions were raised, dismissing them without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 13:54:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52119" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (11) TMI 6 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13109</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, stating that the filing of a revised return post-survey is a factual inquiry and not a legal issue. It emphasized that the absence of incriminating material during the survey and the good faith disclosure by the assessee supported eligibility for benefits under the amnesty scheme. The Court rejected the applications, as no legal questions were raised, dismissing them without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13109</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>