<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (11) TMI 68 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13108</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled against the assessee in a case involving the entitlement to write-off bad debts in reassessment proceedings under section 147. The Court held that bad debts should be reflected in the profit and loss account at the time of finalization of accounts, and reassessment proceedings do not permit the write-off of bad debts. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions allowing bad debts for certain assessment years were reversed, emphasizing that bad debts should be written off in the year in which they became bad. The Court also disagreed with the Tribunal&#039;s finding on true and full disclosure under the amnesty scheme, granting partial relief for some assessment years but upholding penalties for others.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 13:52:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52118" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (11) TMI 68 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13108</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled against the assessee in a case involving the entitlement to write-off bad debts in reassessment proceedings under section 147. The Court held that bad debts should be reflected in the profit and loss account at the time of finalization of accounts, and reassessment proceedings do not permit the write-off of bad debts. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions allowing bad debts for certain assessment years were reversed, emphasizing that bad debts should be written off in the year in which they became bad. The Court also disagreed with the Tribunal&#039;s finding on true and full disclosure under the amnesty scheme, granting partial relief for some assessment years but upholding penalties for others.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13108</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>