https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272864 The Supreme Court held that time was not of the essence in the sale contract and that the respondent was not ready and willing to perform his part of the agreement. The Court reinstated the Trial Court's decision, setting aside the High Court's decree for specific performance. The respondent was not entitled to relief due to lack of readiness and willingness to fulfill the contract. The majority opinion favored the Trial Court's findings, leading to the restoration of its decree. en-us Fri, 02 Sep 1966 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 May 2018 18:23:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272864 The Supreme Court held that time was not of the essence in the sale contract and that the respondent was not ready and willing to perform his part of the agreement. The Court reinstated the Trial Court's decision, setting aside the High Court's decree for specific performance. The respondent was not entitled to relief due to lack of readiness and willingness to fulfill the contract. The majority opinion favored the Trial Court's findings, leading to the restoration of its decree. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 02 Sep 1966 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272864