https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272862 The High Court dismissed the appeal, emphasizing the illegality of the partnership under the Cotton Control Order but upheld the entitlement to claim rendition of accounts due to parties not being in equal fault. The judgment was based on a detailed analysis of the partnership agreement, Control Order provisions, and the fiduciary relationship between the parties. The court affirmed the Single Judge's finding that the plaintiff was a sleeping partner and the defendants managed the business, creating a fiduciary relationship, allowing the rendition of accounts. en-us Mon, 26 Jul 1971 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 May 2018 17:41:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272862 The High Court dismissed the appeal, emphasizing the illegality of the partnership under the Cotton Control Order but upheld the entitlement to claim rendition of accounts due to parties not being in equal fault. The judgment was based on a detailed analysis of the partnership agreement, Control Order provisions, and the fiduciary relationship between the parties. The court affirmed the Single Judge's finding that the plaintiff was a sleeping partner and the defendants managed the business, creating a fiduciary relationship, allowing the rendition of accounts. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 26 Jul 1971 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272862