<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1266 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360702</link>
    <description>The court deemed the reference made by the Assessing Officer to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) invalid as the petitioner&#039;s safe harbour option was validly exercised. Consequently, the TPO&#039;s order dated 15.9.2017 was set aside, and the transfer pricing regime did not apply to the petitioner&#039;s specified domestic transactions for the assessment year 2014-2015. The court allowed the petition, quashing the reference to the TPO and disposing of the matter accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2020 16:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521121" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1266 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360702</link>
      <description>The court deemed the reference made by the Assessing Officer to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) invalid as the petitioner&#039;s safe harbour option was validly exercised. Consequently, the TPO&#039;s order dated 15.9.2017 was set aside, and the transfer pricing regime did not apply to the petitioner&#039;s specified domestic transactions for the assessment year 2014-2015. The court allowed the petition, quashing the reference to the TPO and disposing of the matter accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360702</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>