<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 649 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272841</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer to reexamine the treatment of carry forward unabsorbed depreciation in accordance with the legal position outlined in the Special Bench decision regarding unabsorbed depreciation allowances in different periods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2018 12:37:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 649 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272841</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer to reexamine the treatment of carry forward unabsorbed depreciation in accordance with the legal position outlined in the Special Bench decision regarding unabsorbed depreciation allowances in different periods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272841</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>