https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360685 An appeal filed within the statutory limitation period under Section 421(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 was re-presented one day after the defect-cure period under Rule 26(2) of the NCLAT Rules, 2016, but both the original filing and re-presentation remained within overall limitation. On that basis, Rule 26(3) could be invoked to extend the time for curing defects. The time granted for removal of defects was accordingly extended, and the application was allowed. en-us Tue, 17 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 May 2018 11:44:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360685 An appeal filed within the statutory limitation period under Section 421(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 was re-presented one day after the defect-cure period under Rule 26(2) of the NCLAT Rules, 2016, but both the original filing and re-presentation remained within overall limitation. On that basis, Rule 26(3) could be invoked to extend the time for curing defects. The time granted for removal of defects was accordingly extended, and the application was allowed. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 17 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360685