<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (4) TMI 29 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13099</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue regarding the taxability of unclaimed sundry credit balances written back to the profit and loss account, holding that such amounts should be treated as income. Additionally, the court ruled in favor of the Revenue by denying relief under sections 32A, 80J, and 80HH for income from a tyre retreading unit, as retreading did not qualify as the production of a new article for the purposes of these reliefs. However, the court allowed a deduction under section 80HH for income from the sale of scrap materials but excluded interest on deposits from qualifying for the deduction. Finally, the court ruled in favor of the assessee by including the cost of the building under construction in determining the deduction under section 80J.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 13:35:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52109" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (4) TMI 29 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13099</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue regarding the taxability of unclaimed sundry credit balances written back to the profit and loss account, holding that such amounts should be treated as income. Additionally, the court ruled in favor of the Revenue by denying relief under sections 32A, 80J, and 80HH for income from a tyre retreading unit, as retreading did not qualify as the production of a new article for the purposes of these reliefs. However, the court allowed a deduction under section 80HH for income from the sale of scrap materials but excluded interest on deposits from qualifying for the deduction. Finally, the court ruled in favor of the assessee by including the cost of the building under construction in determining the deduction under section 80J.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13099</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>