<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (11) TMI 67 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13098</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of invoking sections 154 and 147 of the Income-tax Act, allowing rectification for overlooking mandatory provisions and justifying reassessment for escaped income. It mandated computing depreciation as per Schedule XIV to the Companies Act for book profit calculation under section 115J. The decision favored the Revenue and ruled against the assessee for the assessment years 1988-89 and 1989-90.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 13:33:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52108" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (11) TMI 67 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13098</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of invoking sections 154 and 147 of the Income-tax Act, allowing rectification for overlooking mandatory provisions and justifying reassessment for escaped income. It mandated computing depreciation as per Schedule XIV to the Companies Act for book profit calculation under section 115J. The decision favored the Revenue and ruled against the assessee for the assessment years 1988-89 and 1989-90.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13098</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>