<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1239 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360675</link>
    <description>The court held that proceedings based on the notice demanding service tax on food and beverages sales would be deferred until the Apex Court&#039;s decision. If the Apex Court ruled in favor of the Department, the petitioner would have the opportunity to raise further objections and be heard before final orders were issued. The court emphasized the importance of fairness and stated that a new notice would be required before any action if the Apex Court sided with the Department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2018 11:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521073" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1239 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360675</link>
      <description>The court held that proceedings based on the notice demanding service tax on food and beverages sales would be deferred until the Apex Court&#039;s decision. If the Apex Court ruled in favor of the Department, the petitioner would have the opportunity to raise further objections and be heard before final orders were issued. The court emphasized the importance of fairness and stated that a new notice would be required before any action if the Apex Court sided with the Department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360675</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>