<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1228 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360664</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT New Delhi, comprising Justice Dr. Satish Chandra and Member (Technical) Mr. V. Padmanabhan, restored an appeal challenging a service tax demand on a sub-broker for commission received. The Tribunal set aside the initial dismissal of the appeal, allowing a hearing on the merits. Citing a precedent case, the Tribunal remanded the matter to the Original Authority for further proceedings, ultimately allowing the appellant&#039;s appeal through remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2018 11:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521059" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1228 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360664</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT New Delhi, comprising Justice Dr. Satish Chandra and Member (Technical) Mr. V. Padmanabhan, restored an appeal challenging a service tax demand on a sub-broker for commission received. The Tribunal set aside the initial dismissal of the appeal, allowing a hearing on the merits. Citing a precedent case, the Tribunal remanded the matter to the Original Authority for further proceedings, ultimately allowing the appellant&#039;s appeal through remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360664</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>