https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360660 The Judicial Member allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, setting aside the disallowance of CENVAT credit amounting to &8377; 5,624 imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals). The Judicial Member found that the Commissioner (Appeals) erred in denying the credit based solely on a receipt without considering the supporting documents provided by the appellant. The appeal was successful, dropping the interest and penalties imposed, and ruling in favor of the appellant for the disputed amount. en-us Mon, 09 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 May 2018 08:24:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360660 The Judicial Member allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, setting aside the disallowance of CENVAT credit amounting to &8377; 5,624 imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals). The Judicial Member found that the Commissioner (Appeals) erred in denying the credit based solely on a receipt without considering the supporting documents provided by the appellant. The appeal was successful, dropping the interest and penalties imposed, and ruling in favor of the appellant for the disputed amount. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 09 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360660