<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1223 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360659</link>
    <description>Deputation of employees from a parent company to an appellant was held not taxable as manpower recruitment or supply agency service where the deputed staff worked under the appellant&#039;s control and supervision, tax was deducted at source from their salary and perks, and no separate consideration was paid to the parent company. On those facts, there was no agency-client relationship; the arrangement was treated as an employer-employee relationship, and the salary disbursement method did not change the true character of the transaction. The demand for service tax on a reverse charge basis, along with interest and penalties, was therefore not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2019 10:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521053" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1223 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360659</link>
      <description>Deputation of employees from a parent company to an appellant was held not taxable as manpower recruitment or supply agency service where the deputed staff worked under the appellant&#039;s control and supervision, tax was deducted at source from their salary and perks, and no separate consideration was paid to the parent company. On those facts, there was no agency-client relationship; the arrangement was treated as an employer-employee relationship, and the salary disbursement method did not change the true character of the transaction. The demand for service tax on a reverse charge basis, along with interest and penalties, was therefore not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360659</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>