<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1221 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360657</link>
    <description>The appeals challenging the rejection of refund claims based on CENVAT Credit and time limit grounds were successful. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for reconsideration, emphasizing the importance of following principles of natural justice. The appellants were granted the opportunity to present relevant documents before the authority. All four appeals were remanded for further review and decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2018 08:24:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521050" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1221 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360657</link>
      <description>The appeals challenging the rejection of refund claims based on CENVAT Credit and time limit grounds were successful. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for reconsideration, emphasizing the importance of following principles of natural justice. The appellants were granted the opportunity to present relevant documents before the authority. All four appeals were remanded for further review and decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360657</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>