<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1209 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360645</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of Cenvat Credit but set aside the penalty imposed on the assessee for availing the credit wrongly. The Court ruled against the Revenue, dismissing both appeals and emphasizing the lack of fraudulent intent by the assessee. The decision highlighted the pending nature of the initial proceedings and the absence of evidence supporting mala fide actions. The parties were directed to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 17:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521035" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1209 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360645</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of Cenvat Credit but set aside the penalty imposed on the assessee for availing the credit wrongly. The Court ruled against the Revenue, dismissing both appeals and emphasizing the lack of fraudulent intent by the assessee. The decision highlighted the pending nature of the initial proceedings and the absence of evidence supporting mala fide actions. The parties were directed to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360645</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>