<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1205 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360641</link>
    <description>The Tribunal clarified that full exemption is required for CENVAT credit eligibility under Rule 6(6)(vii). The appellant&#039;s compliance with declaring exemption but not reversing credit showed no fraudulent intent. Penalties were dismissed, and interest reduced due to lack of wilful misstatement. The appellant was not held liable for interest and penalties, emphasizing accurate reporting and absence of intentional wrongdoing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2018 08:19:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521030" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1205 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360641</link>
      <description>The Tribunal clarified that full exemption is required for CENVAT credit eligibility under Rule 6(6)(vii). The appellant&#039;s compliance with declaring exemption but not reversing credit showed no fraudulent intent. Penalties were dismissed, and interest reduced due to lack of wilful misstatement. The appellant was not held liable for interest and penalties, emphasizing accurate reporting and absence of intentional wrongdoing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360641</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>