<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (4) TMI 28 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13093</link>
    <description>The High Court of MADRAS ruled in a case concerning the interpretation of section 269C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding property acquisition proceedings. The Court emphasized that all conditions under section 269C(1) must be met to initiate proceedings, highlighting the necessity of establishing the intent of tax evasion or concealment. The Court found the acquisition proceedings lacked substantial evidence to prove such intent and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside the acquisition order. Ultimately, the Court dismissed the appeal, stressing the importance of fulfilling all statutory requirements before initiating acquisition proceedings based solely on property valuations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 13:22:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52103" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (4) TMI 28 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13093</link>
      <description>The High Court of MADRAS ruled in a case concerning the interpretation of section 269C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding property acquisition proceedings. The Court emphasized that all conditions under section 269C(1) must be met to initiate proceedings, highlighting the necessity of establishing the intent of tax evasion or concealment. The Court found the acquisition proceedings lacked substantial evidence to prove such intent and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside the acquisition order. Ultimately, the Court dismissed the appeal, stressing the importance of fulfilling all statutory requirements before initiating acquisition proceedings based solely on property valuations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>