<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1198 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360634</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee-Appellants, setting aside the order of the Commissioner of Central Excise. The Tribunal found that the Cenvat Credit had been validly paid and availed through ISD challans. It noted that the Department had disallowed the credit without considering other services covered under the invoices. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration, providing the assessee-Appellants with an opportunity to present their case effectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2018 08:19:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=521022" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1198 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360634</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee-Appellants, setting aside the order of the Commissioner of Central Excise. The Tribunal found that the Cenvat Credit had been validly paid and availed through ISD challans. It noted that the Department had disallowed the credit without considering other services covered under the invoices. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration, providing the assessee-Appellants with an opportunity to present their case effectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360634</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>