https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360624 The Tribunal set aside penalties imposed under Section 11AC and Rule 25D of the Central Excise Act due to lack of intention to evade duty, citing previous decisions and the unconstitutionality of Rule 8(3A). A penalty of Rs. 5,000 under Rule 27 was upheld for violating the Central Excise Rules, emphasizing compliance. The impugned order was deemed legally unsustainable, with penalties under Section 11AC and Rule 25D overturned, and the penalty under Rule 27 affirmed. en-us Wed, 04 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 May 2018 11:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360624 The Tribunal set aside penalties imposed under Section 11AC and Rule 25D of the Central Excise Act due to lack of intention to evade duty, citing previous decisions and the unconstitutionality of Rule 8(3A). A penalty of Rs. 5,000 under Rule 27 was upheld for violating the Central Excise Rules, emphasizing compliance. The impugned order was deemed legally unsustainable, with penalties under Section 11AC and Rule 25D overturned, and the penalty under Rule 27 affirmed. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 04 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360624