https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360620 Recovery proceedings under the demand notices were kept in abeyance for a limited period to allow the petitioner to pursue relief in the pending appeal. The request was confined to temporary protection, and the challenge to the consequential demand was not separately pressed. As the appeal was stated to be pending with defects, the court granted one month's protection against recovery, preserving the petitioner's ability to seek appropriate relief before the appellate forum without determining the merits of the underlying demand. en-us Fri, 11 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 May 2018 15:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360620 Recovery proceedings under the demand notices were kept in abeyance for a limited period to allow the petitioner to pursue relief in the pending appeal. The request was confined to temporary protection, and the challenge to the consequential demand was not separately pressed. As the appeal was stated to be pending with defects, the court granted one month's protection against recovery, preserving the petitioner's ability to seek appropriate relief before the appellate forum without determining the merits of the underlying demand. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 11 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=360620